Category Archive
Lawyer ethics opinion could computing
By
Admin
|
Published
August 5, 2013
|
Posted in
Florida Ethics Opinion 12-3 ethics of cloud computing, Florida lawyer cloud computing, joe corsmeier, Joseph Corsmeier, Lawyer cloud computing and confidentiality, Lawyer ethics, Lawyer Ethics and Professionalism, Lawyer ethics opinion cloud computing, Lawyer ethics opinion could computing, Lawyer ethics opinions, Lawyer Professionalism
|
Tagged
Tags: Attorney Ethics, Bar ethics rules, confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer cloud computing
|
Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert blog with an update on The Florida Bar’s Ethics Advisory Opinion 12-3 on cloud computing and protecting client confidences when storing client records in the digital “cloud” using third party vendors. The Florida Bar’s Board of Governors approved the opinion (with a minor revision to the final paragraph) Read More
Read More
By
Admin
|
Published
August 4, 2012
|
Posted in
Attorney/client privilege and confidentiality, Florida lawyer cloud computing, Florida Lawyer Ethics and Professionalism, joe corsmeier, Lawyer cloud computing and confidentiality, Lawyer ethics, Lawyer Ethics and Professionalism, Lawyer ethics opinion could computing, Lawyer ethics opinions
|
Tagged
Tags: Attorney Ethics, attorney/client confidentiality, client confidentiality, confidentiality, corsmeier, Florida Bar, Florida Bar Oath of Admission, joseph corsmeier, Lawyer cloud computing, lawyer confidentiality
|
Hello and welcome to this Ethics Alert which will provide an update on the status of the potential ethics advisory opinion on cloud computing and the recent decision of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar (BOG) to direct Professional Ethics Committee (PEC) to prepare an ethics opinion on protecting client confidences when lawyers Read More
Read More